- No upcoming events available
Term limits are such a bad idea. They undermine and weaken government by enforcing a constant turnover of public officials, leaving as permanent fixtures only the lobbyists and special interests.
But don't believe me. Prof. Eric Lane who led a task force that restructured NYC government in 1990 had this to say on WNYC last night ('hour two'):
Eric Lane (42:40): I think the City Council has worked out very well relative to what it was before. I think that the complaint about too many hacks out for their own good has lot to do with term limits which we did not put into the Charter.*
But the term limits have sort of forced people that want to stay in government to spend a lot of their time running for office and thinking of themselves individually as opposed to thinking about the Council itself institutionally. And I think that’s gravely weakened the Council.
He felt so strongly about the issue that he came back to it after a couple of minutes:
Eric Lane (45:48) I want to come back to this point -- the limiting terms in this case. What it’s done is to make everybody start to think about what’s the next office they’re going to run for and who they’re going to compete against. And that does not help the joint action that good legislatures need.
*Note: term limits were passed by referendum a few years later thanks to a campaign funded by rightwing billionaire Ron Lauder.
What I can't understand is why these teabagging activities are news. I mean, just because Obama won the election didn't mean the loyal (cough, cough) opposition suddenly ceased to exist.
The fact that they're still around and that you can collect a bunch of them together thanks to their nationwide propaganda network is no big deal. They're always going to be against anything the Democrats do but they're also in the minority -- so not only is their reaction predictable but it's irrelevant as well.
Attempting to attribute any broader social significance to their activities is the sign of a charlatan (or someone from the MSM).
From Harold Meyerson's review of two books on Wal-Mart:
For the past year, Americans have focused, and understandably so, on the ways in which Wall Street has misshaped the American economy, how finance has grown large over the past 20 years as manufacturing has shrunk. But the rise of finance is just half the story; it takes the rise of retail to complete the tale. Both Wall Street and Wal-Mart played a central role in the deindustrialization of the United States: 40,000 U.S factories were closed between 2001, when China was admitted to the World Trade Organization, and 2007, during which years Wal-Mart's Chinese imports tripled in value from $9 billion to $27 billion.
"40,000 U.S factories" -- wow, talk about national calamity.
Ted Kennedy's letter to Obama:
May 12, 2009
Dear Mr. President,
I wanted to write a few final words to you to express my gratitude for your repeated personal kindnesses to me – and one last time, to salute your leadership in giving our country back its future and its truth.
On a personal level, you and Michelle reached out to Vicki, to our family and me in so many different ways. You helped to make these difficult months a happy time in my life.
Progressive Change Committee Petition:
Petition text: "We worked so hard for real change. President Obama, please demand a strong public health insurance option in your speech to Congress. Letting the insurance companies win would not be change we can believe in."
Petition text: "President Obama, we're counting on you to fight for bold change on health care--including a strong public health insurance option. It's the key to breaking the stranglehold that private insurers have over our health care system."
Frankly, since the GOP has run away from the negotiating table on health care reform, it really doesn't matter what they think. Not. One. Bit.
Health care reform is going to pass no matter how hysterical they become. They've relegated themselves to irrelevance.
Picture taken right at the start while the sun was still up.
So the head of the RNC is going around bad-mouthing government. You got supporters running around with 'tree of liberty' tee-shirts and others talking about the perils of government access to online medical records.
It's hard then to explain their earlier confidence when government was detaining people without trial and bugging their phones without warrants. No problem there.
So my question is, what happened?
From the Press Release:
Daniel Biss on Thursday announced his candidacy for the 17th Legislative District of Illinois. Biss, a Democrat, ran a historic campaign for the seat in 2008 against entrenched six-term incumbent Elizabeth Coulson, a transformative candidacy that stunned insiders. Coulson has relinquished her seat to run for Congress.
Here's what I wrote in November:
I hope every adult in this country points their kids to Senator Kennedy as one of the most positive examples we have of one man's commitment to the public good.
Forget all the cheap cynicism you hear all over the place -- it's being mouthed by a bunch of blockheads. This guy, Senator Kennedy, has come back practically from his deathbed to make sure everyone in this country has access to health care.
He's an example for us all.
Let's show our appreciation of this extraordinary public servant and pass health care reform worthy of him and of this country.